Introduction: High standards of inpatient care are associated with improved clinical outcomes for IBD patients. IBD standards have been recommended internationally (e. g UK, Australia). We aimed to assess the current care of IBD inpatients, and compare to a previous audit in 2013. Methods: We identified all patients admitted to Christchurch hospital over a 6-month period from March to August 2019 with an IBD flare using hospital discharge codes. Data were extracted from clinical records and analysed descriptively. Results: Seventy-two IBD flares (32 male and 40 female; median age 44 [17-81] years) were identified, including 58 with Crohn’ s Disease (CD) and 14 with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Forty-one (57%) were managed under Gastroenterology, thirty-one (43%) under General Surgery. Contact with the IBD helpline resulted in three admissions (4%). Seventy-one (99%) had smoking status documented, and ten (14%) were current smokers. Compared to the 2013 audit, significantly more patients with luminal symptoms had abdominal imaging (89% vs 45%; p<. 01). More patients received venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (65% vs 48%; p=0. 052). Stool cultures and Clostridium difficile toxin were analysed in 48% compared to 39%, p=. 38. Of the forty-two (58%) discharged on oral prednisone, thirty-nine (93%) had a taper plan. No patients received bone protection. There were 43 complications in the following six-months among CD patients, and seven among UC patients. On average, time to clinic was 6. 3 weeks following discharge. There were five UC and forty-one CD readmissions in the following 11 months. Conclusions: Some IBD standards are being met or have improved, such as smoking status, abdominal imaging, follow up and VTE prophylaxis. Other standards could be improved; such as stool sampling and bone protection. These results will be used to drive improvements to patient care, through presentation at departmental meetings and formation of clinical protocols. Standards will be re-audited in the future.